Computer & Communication Industry Association
PublishedJune 19, 2014

CCIA Welcomes Supreme Court Clarification On Patent Eligibility of Software

Washington – The Supreme Court issued its ruling today in a key case examining the patent eligibility of software. In a unanimous ruling the court offered some guidance on what an abstract idea is and said that implementing an abstract idea on a generic computer is not an invention eligible for a patent.

The Alice v. CLS Bank ruling could have far reaching implications for a variety of industries as well as the growing business of patent lawsuits, many stemming from patents on software. The Computer & Communications Industry Association (CCIA) had filed an amicus brief in the case asking the court to develop a new test for the patent eligibility of software. The following can be attributed to CCIA President & CEO Ed Black:

“The court has found that taking an idea and implementing it on a computer does not deserve a patent. This is a sound decision ensuring our patent laws are better aligned with the original intent of our founders.  We need to keep in mind that when the Government grants a patent they are authorizing the patent recipient to exercise monopoly power.

“The Justices interpreted the law in a way that will cut back on some flimsy patents without impacting more deserving ones. Better quality patents will help curb the patent troll problem. The U.S. Patent & Trademark Office will now need to issue new guidelines on software patents, and we look forward to reviewing them. Major further reform of the patent system remains a high priority because until fixed, it will too often be an obstacle to innovation rather than a tool for advancing it.”

The following can be attributed to CCIA patent counsel Matt Levy:

“This is an important tool in the fight against patent trolls, but it is not going to solve the problem. The Justices applied their unanimous decision in Mayo to software, as we had hoped they would. Software patents commonly use very generic terms in order to cover any possible computer implementation, and the Federal Circuit was greatly expanding what could be patented. The Court has put the brakes on that expansion and brought some common sense back to the world of software.”

News

New Study Finds EU Space Act Could Cost U.S. Companies Billions While Benefiting Chinese Competitors

Washington — According to a new white paper released today by The Computer & Communications Industry Association, the European Union Space Act (EUSA) could greatly hamper U.S. space competitiven...
reading-tablet
  • Press Releases
  • Space & Spectrum
News

Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals Reaffirms Bar on Restrictive Texas Internet Law, HB18

Washington – The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals has affirmed a preliminary injunction that blocked Texas from enforcing its social media law HB18, known as the Securing Children Online through Paren...
reading-tablet
  • Press Releases
  • Online Safety
News

CCIA Response to $1 Billion Google DMA Fine Announced by European Commission 

In response to the European Commission announcing a nearly $1 billion fine for Google under the EU’s Digital Markets Act, the following can be attributed to Daniel Friedlaender, Senior Vice Presiden...
reading-tablet
  • Statements
  • Tax
News

CCIA Releases Report on Cost, Status of Key Digital Services Taxes

Washington — According to new findings released today by the Computer & Communications Industry Association, discriminatory digital services taxes (DSTs) in five key markets pulled in approximat...
reading-tablet
  • Press Releases
  • Trade