Several House members have introduced a controversial bill
that could interrupt access to legal websites and compromise the stability and
security of the Internet itself.
This
bill would allow the Justice Department to blacklist Internet sites that allegedly
facilitate intellectual property rights infringement, and not only cut them off
from U.S. advertisers and financial services like credit cards, but regulate
ISPs and search. This is
accomplished in part through mandated manipulation of the Internet domain name
addressing system (DNS). Current
law (the Digital Millennium Copyright Act) already contains an effective notice
and takedown process in which U.S. search engines and websites remove massive
amounts of infringing material every day.
The Computer & Communications Industry Association,
which fights Internet filtering and censorship at home and abroad, opposes this
proposed Internet regulation because it will be ineffective at stopping the
worst piracy offenders, yet unfortunately will create a host of new technical concerns
that impact government initiatives to protect national security.
The following can be attributed to CCIA President &
CEO Ed Black:
“There are ways to reduce infringement without
compromising the stability and security of the Internet. Those who understand
how the Internet navigation system works, realize this bill is akin to trying to
block phones calls by ripping a page from a phone book. Those intent on
reaching infringing content online can still get there. What this bill instead
will do is create security issues on the Internet for everyone and Balkanize
Internet traffic. While this presents risks for all Internet users, it also
undermines both our own foreign policy against Internet censorship and our
national security policy, which monitors the Internet for terrorist threats. By
pushing Internet routing overseas and casting a broad net that will snare
legitimate websites, the Internet is less secure – and so is the country.
“This Hollywood-backed bill is just not ready for release.
Rushing through a bill that offers few real gains for one sector of the
economy, while harming so many other legitimate US companies in these economic
times is unwise. Even worse, this parochial legislation contradicts US trade
policy, foreign policy and existing programs aimed at protecting national
security.
“Common ground on legislation to combat copyright
infringement is possible without serious collateral damage on the Internet. But
to get there, more members of Congress need more complete information on how
the Internet works and its vulnerabilities. The bill needs fixes based on recommendations
of Internet
engineers and cybersecurity
experts who have written to Congress about their serious concerns.
“In many ways this bill is
even worse than its Senate compatriot.
It completely rewrites DMCA safe harbors that have allowed the Internet
industry to flourish, its ambiguous definitions have the potential to frustrate
large and small IT operations alike, and it lowers legal standards for
censorship that have been expressly rejected by the Supreme Court. This bill is a disaster.”
The following can be attributed to CCIA Vice President
Cathy Sloan:
“This legislation short circuits efforts to ensure members
of Congress understand the baseline requirements for the smooth, secure
functioning of the global Internet.
“The tech industry has worked together in the past
with the recording and movie industry to reduce piracy through the Digital
Millennium Copyright Act. But this new bill is inconsistent with parts of the
DMCA, which contains no obligations to monitor or filter Internet content. The
DMCA safe harbors and notice and takedown provisions have been considered
effective enough at reducing real copyright infringement that we have signed
several trade agreements this year based on the DMCA.”