CCIA Praises Introduction of Surveillance Transparency Legislation
8/2/2013
Two House and Senate
Judiciary committee leaders on privacy issues have introduced legislation to
add transparency requirements to the law used by the NSA to carry out
surveillance on Americans. Sen. Al Franken, D-Minn., has introduced the
Surveillance Transparency Act of 2013, and Rep. Zoe Lofgren, D-Calif.,“The
Surveillance Order Reporting Act.”
Both bills give companies
who receive data demands from the government the ability to report raw numbers
in their transparency reports to users. Franken’s bill also would require the
government to annually report the scope of its surveillance requests it carries
out using authority like that given in the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance
Act and US PATRIOT Act, as well as the numbers of Americans and legal residents
targeted. The bills are fairly similar in terms of seeking more transparency so
that those outside the intelligence community can better understand the size,
scope and use of surveillance.
The Computer &
Communications Industry Association had cautioned about the need for checks and
balances on surveillance and had testified against the renewal of FISA. The
following can be attributed to CCIA President & CEO Ed Black:
"These bills represent a
concrete first step toward giving the American people some of the information
they need if they are going to fully evaluate the surveillance law that they
live under. It also gives American Internet companies the ability to set the
record straight on exactly what the government requests, enhancing user trust
online."
The following can be
attributed to CCIA Public Policy and Regulatory Counsel Ross Schulman:
"Reporting only the raw
numbers of government requests to companies is a step that can only help the
American people and businesses at the same time. Concrete information about the
scope of surveillance activity under the PATRIOT Act is something that has been
missing from the public debate since its passage. In addition, listing only the
numbers of requests is unlikely in the large majority of cases, to truly harm
national security interests."
For more on why CCIA
believes transparency is a critical part of the national debate on this issue
see Black’s Huffington Post editorial “Secrecy,
Democracy and the NSA.”