CCIA Applauds New Joint Venture Aimed at Bridging the Digital Divide; Calls on Major Broadband Providers to Expand Model throughout Country
1/22/2009
Washington -- The Computer & Communications Industry Association
applauds Meraki and OneEconomy’s partnership aimed at bringing
broadband to low-income residents of San Francisco. CCIA also commends
AT&T for making this possible by altering terms of service, which
traditionally prohibit others from using DSL with wireless routers to
serve individuals beyond one subscriber household. The benefits of such
a model can be realized throughout the United States if carriers make
similar commitments to non-profits around the country.
“As Congress
gets set to vote on a stimulus package that would provide billions of
dollars to encourage broadband deployment to underserved communities,
policymakers and business leaders must develop new approaches to
solving our connectivity problems. This is exactly the type of
innovative thinking that needs to be encouraged and echoed to close the
Digital Divide,” said Ed Black, CCIA President and CEO.
“Business as usual approaches will not help connect millions of
disenfranchised Americans who have the most to gain from broadband and
the benefits it can provide. The educational and commercial advantages
that high-speed Internet access confers will help low-income residents
more fully realize the benefits of the digital economy. We strongly
urge AT&T and other last-mile broadband providers to make similar
commitments to other qualified non-profits throughout the country.
Until AT&T and other major providers voluntarily agree to allow
non-profits to efficiently tap into the existing broadband
infrastructure, these non-profits and their new technology cannot fill
the service void. It will take more than just a one-time government
infusion of cash to target underserved communities. New approaches that
drastically lower the cost of Internet service, particularly to
vulnerable communities who cannot not afford the traditional high cost
of broadband access, must be encouraged.”
Since its founding in 2000, OneEconomy Corporation has worked
tirelessly to bring the benefits of the digital age to low-income
individuals around the world. It truly has proven to be a visionary
organization that is redefining philanthropy in innovative ways.
However, similar organizations with a primarily local or regional focus
have begun to spring up around the country.
“Our organization, and others like it, have developed nearly identical
models to the one recently announced by OneEconomy and Meraki,” said
Lowell Feldman, a professor of Communications Law at University of
Texas Law School whose students operate their own non-profit called
USFON. “We will all be better off if we acknowledge when market failure
occurs and then address the failure with an efficient technological
response.
“For-profit business models have historically neglected poor
communities for obvious reasons. If AT&T and other providers pledge
to make similar terms available to a wide array of community
organizations, my organization and others like it across the country
are positioned for immediate action. Not only will existing non-profits
be able to drastically expand their operations aimed at serving
vulnerable low-income communities, but more non-profit initiatives will
spring up at universities and charitable organizations around the
country.
“If market entry impediments created by the incumbents like the ‘terms
of service’ agreements are modified either voluntarily or by regulatory
reform, we are likely to see a paradigm shift in how broadband and
phone service are provided to poor communities. Just as important, the
strain on Universal Service and other government subsidy programs will
be relieved because of cost efficiencies achieved through the newer
technology and alternative service models. Our students provide service
through USFON for approximately one-eighth of what the incumbents claim
is their cost. They are also motivated by a calling to community
service, not by a motivation to maximize the subsidy amount from the
government or the revenue from the subscriber.”