CCIA Notes Dangers Of Deep Packet Inspection Used By Governments Like Iran

BY CCIA Staff
June 22, 2009

As Iranians demonstrate in the wake of the election, Iranian officials have tried to control access to information by kicking journalists out of the country and limiting what official news outlets can report. Now the Wall Street Journal and other publications are reporting on how Iranian officials are using the Internet to censor information and spy on citizens using deep packet inspection.

DPI allows network operators or a government to intercept data flowing over the Internet, deconstruct it to examine for particular keywords and then reconstruct it in a matter of seconds. The following statement can be attributed to Computer & Communications Industry Association President & CEO Ed Black.

“Reports that Iran is using this technology to detect political dissenters online are disturbing. The Internet can be a tool to enhance political communication and participation in a democracy – or it can become an even more intrusive way for a government to control access to information, spy on its citizens and detect political adversaries.

“George Orwell’s vision of a telescreen in every home or office that can make it possible for authorities to see and hear a citizen at any time is no longer fiction. If these news reports in the aftermath of the 2009 election are correct, it is 1984 in Iran. They come just weeks after reports China was using deep packet inspection as part of the so-called ‘Great Firewall.’

“When network operators – either a government or commercial operator – use deep packet inspection, the privacy of Internet users is compromised. In the wrong hands, this privacy invasion quickly turns into a human rights violation. Iran is yet another example of why the use of certain technologies such as deep packet inspection needs to be restricted.

“Controlling access to information has been a hallmark of repressive regimes throughout history. The techniques are now more advanced and more insidious. A country’s policy on Internet freedom and openness should be noted as part of our State Department’s regular monitoring of human rights. There needs to be a coordinated effort across all departments and agencies to bring the full power and attention of the U.S. Government in promoting Internet freedom as a human rights issue and as a democracy-building endeavor.

“While the United States can’t control what happens in Iran, it can be a model for practices that support democracy. Restricting the use of DPI to protect the freedom of the Internet is a step toward preserving freedom that responsible, democratic governments should be taking. If the U.S. government and others who care about liberty don’t push Internet freedom to the top of the priority list now, they’ll be failing the future.”

 

Related Articles

CCIA Asks Senate Judiciary To Extend And Strengthen USA FREEDOM Act Protections

Nov 5, 2019

Washington — The Senate Judiciary Committee holds its first hearing Wednesday on reauthorizing the USA FREEDOM Act of 2015. The Computer & Communications Industry Association is calling on senators to maintain due process and civil liberties protections for US citizens under current surveillance authority and to use this periodic reauthorization to re-evaluate whether the law…

CCIA Encouraged by Increasing Support For Federal Privacy Legislation

Oct 15, 2019

Washington – The New Democrat Coalition, representing more than 100 House Democrats, has announced support for federal privacy legislation introduced by Congresswoman Suzan DelBene, D-Wash. The bill would give consumers control over their personal information, empower the Federal Trade Commission with additional tools and resources to patrol online privacy practices, and ensure that individuals across…

EU Court Ruling On Worldwide Take Down of Defamatory Content Raises Freedom of Speech Concerns

Oct 3, 2019

Brussels, BELGIUM — The EU Court of Justice today ruled that host providers can be asked to take down defamatory content, that is “identical” or “equivalent” to content previously ruled illegal under national rules. The Decision adds that hosting providers should remove information covered by the injunction or block access to that information worldwide, as…