Supreme Court Hears Bilski Patent Case

BY CCIA Staff
November 9, 2009

As the Supreme Court heard arguments in Bilski v. Kappos (08-964) today, a case which should help answer the question, ‘what is patentable?’ – the Computer & Communications Industry Association urged the Court to correct a patent system that has run amok.

CCIA argued in a friend-of-the-court brief before the Supreme Court and the court below, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, that the radical expansion of what is patentable in recent years has threatened information technology and the stability of the patent system.

The following comment may be attributed to CCIA President & CEO Ed Black:

“The unprecedented expansion of the patent system and the ensuing virtual land-rush that it created put lawyers in charge of innovation and enabled opportunism to trump opportunity. All of this has produced a crisis of credibility in our intellectual property system. It is time to get back to basics, where our IP law promotes progress, not patenting, and where discovery is what inventors do, instead of what lawyers do.

“All intellectual property regimes can provide benefits, but they all inherently come at a cost to other values. Excessive patent protections impose massive costs to the next generation of innovators and provide little benefit.”

“We hope the arguments presented today move the Supreme Court to return to the wisdom of its earlier rulings and affirm strong principles about the limits of patentable subject matter.”

Additional background:

  • The lack of limits on patentable subject matter as a result of the State Street decision has created chaos in the marketplace and provided fertile breeding ground for patent trolls. CCIA has commended the Federal Circuit decision in Bilski as an effort to redraw the limits consistent with Supreme Court precedent.
  • CCIA was encouraged by the Federal Circuit decision in Bilski because it cuts back on what has been an extremely problematic area in the patent system that stems from granting patents on abstract subject matter.
  • For CCIA’s amicus brief filed in this Supreme Court case last month, click here

 

Related Articles

CCIA Asks Supreme Court To Review Constitutionality of ITC’s Actions In Patent Case Illustrating Expanded Use Of ITC Against US Companies

Apr 27, 2020

Washington — As the International Trade Commission has increasingly expanded its jurisdiction to include ruling on domestic patent issues, the Computer & Communications Industry Association filed an amicus brief Monday afternoon asking the Supreme Court to grant cert and review the misuse of the ITC by foreign entities against US companies. The Federal District court…

CCIA Asks Supreme Court To Preserve Copyright Framework That Allows Interoperability

Jan 13, 2020

Washington — The Computer & Communications Industry Association has filed an amicus brief in a Supreme Court case that has major implications for the entire tech industry. The issue in Google v. Oracle is whether the reuse of certain program elements necessary for interoperability is an infringement of copyright law. The case has been under…

CCIA Patent Counsel Josh Landau Testifies Before Senate Subcommittee

Sep 11, 2019

Washington — CCIA Patent Counsel Josh Landau will testify  before the Senate Judiciary’s IP subcommittee today on pending patent legislation. Landau will caution senators that provisions in the STRONGER Patents Act weaken the inter partes review procedure used to invalidate patents that never should have been issued. In his written testimony, Landau said, “The STRONGER…