When patents protect against patent trolling

BY CCIA Staff
March 12, 2010

We have to give former Sun CEO Jonathan Schwartz credit—he’s nothing if not interesting. After all, how many Fortune 500 presidents resign via Twitter haiku?

Schwartz now occupies his time blogging and commenting on the latest tech trends. His most recent post on the increasingly litigious nature of Apple caught our attention.
Buried towards the bottom, he notes the danger of NPEs and the threat they posed to Sun during his tenure. He goes on to link to a pending patent, which he defines as “an application to patent the act of trolling.”
The actual patent needs to be seen to be believed. Essentially, if Troll A owns this patent, and Troll B sues Legitimate Company C for infringement, Troll A could turn around and sue Troll B for violating its trolling patent. As Schwartz puts it, “it would give the patent holder a reciprocal claim against a patent troll.
If that’s not strange enough, get this—the patent applicant is service provider and government contractor Halliburton. Yes, that Halliburton.
Take a look at the patent application – it’s good entertainment value.

Related Articles

PTO Requests Comments On Changes To Make It Difficult To Challenge Weak Patents

Oct 19, 2020

Washington – The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office has requested comments on making permanent changes to the system currently used to challenge weak or overly broad patents known as inter partes review.  The Computer & Communications Industry Association sent a letter to Patent and Trademark Office Director Iancu last year warning him that making it…

CCIA Expresses Disappointment In Flawed 9th Circuit Qualcomm Decision

Aug 11, 2020

Washington — The 9th Circuit today overturned a district court decision by Judge Lucy Koh, holding that Qualcomm had not violated the antitrust laws by refusing to license competitors in violation of its contractual obligation to do so, by refusing to sell chips unless the customer first took a patent license, and by engaging in…