CCIA’s Black Tells Senate, “Internet Censorship Is A Trade Barrier”

BY CCIA Staff
November 18, 2010

Computer & Communications Industry Association President & CEO Ed Black is scheduled to testify Thursday at a Senate Finance subcommittee hearing, “International Trade in the Digital Economy.” The issue of Internet censorship and filtering has received more attention from the State Department and USTR during the Obama administration.

Black has been an advocate on international free speech and censorship issues for decades and continues to serve on the State Department’s Advisory Committee on International Communication and Information Policy.

Black will tell the committee that CCIA members report 40 countries engage in broad, widespread Internet censorship. Whether this is to block information for political reasons or to protect domestic firms from competition, the net impact is that US companies are facing barriers to foreign markets.

Black says information discrimination represents a classic “non-tariff trade barrier” and recommends U.S. officials enforce existing laws and ensure new international agreements better protect the digital economy by clearly banning Internet filtering, censorship and secondary liability.

In his testimony, Black will offer details on which countries are creating barriers along with examples of nations enacting policies that keep US firms from doing business and favor incumbent domestic tech companies. The examples range from intentionally redirecting Internet traffic from foreign sites to domestic sites, to using filtering technology that causes foreign-based services to be degraded for domestic users. There is also a ripple effect beyond tech companies to the advertisers, who are the direct revenue source for many Internet services.

The following quotes can be attributed to CCIA President & CEO Ed Black’s testimony:

“The free expression and free flow of ideas is a necessary condition for successful governance under democratic principles. Attempts to control the citizenry’s access to information must be relegated to the dustbin of history. Government restrictions on content and services are more worthy of “1984” than 2010.

“When governments treat foreign firms differently, they are erecting to market entry that would not otherwise exist, creating advantages for domestic firms and disadvantages for foreign competitors. Such advantages range from intentionally redirecting Internet traffic from foreign sites to domestic sites, to using filtering technology that causes foreign-based services to be degraded for domestic users. These practices also affect advertisers, who are the direct revenue source for many Internet services.

“Restrictions on access to information will reduce demand for computing devices and consumer communications devices, markets in which U.S. businesses have strong positions and strong brands. Information discrimination thus impairs many industries at the heart of the U.S. information technology sector.

“Unreasonable liability rules in other countries are effectively acting as market barriers. Since the early days of the Internet, Congress has recognized that holding Internet and e-commerce businesses liable for the wrongful conduct of their users would jeopardize the growth of this vital industry and place unreasonable burdens on these companies. We next to export language like the safe harbors provision in the Digital Millennium Copyright act as well as another provision in the Communications Decency Act that that allows Internet companies to combat undesirable or illegal content without fear of liability.

“We must also discourage attempts to deputize online intermediaries into law enforcement. If the United States cannot maintain a free and open Internet, we cannot expect that any other nation will do so. Proposals to require Internet communication services to build in back doors for government eavesdropping would create vulnerabilities in secure communications systems, making it easier for governments across the globe to further tamp down on the free flow of information, censor content, and block disfavored services.”

Related Articles

CCIA Welcomes Launch of U.S-UK Trade Talks

May 5, 2020

Washington — The Computer & Communications Industry Association welcomes the start of negotiations for a U.S.-UK Trade Agreement.  CCIA filed comments last year with the United States Trade Representative outlining digital trade priorities, encouraging USTR to build off progress made in the U.S.-Mexico-Canada Agreement and establish strong rules for digital commerce.   The following can be…

USTR Releases Notorious Markets Report

Apr 29, 2020

Washington —  The Office of the U.S. Trade Representative released its annual Notorious Markets Report identifying online and physical marketplaces that reportedly engage in and facilitate piracy and counterfeiting. USTR also released the 2020 Special 301 Report.  The Computer & Communications Industry Association is an international trade association which has members that enforce policies aimed…

CCIA Recommendations on Negotiating Priorities for U.S-Kenya Trade

Apr 28, 2020

Washington — Following USTR’s announcement in February that the United States would seek to negotiate a trade deal with Kenya, the Computer & Communications Industry Association filed comments today with USTR outlining trade priorities for digital services in an agreement.  The comments discuss the needs for an intellectual property chapter that ensures protections for online…