House Communications Subcommittee Expected To Register Disapproval of FCC's Rules To Ensure Customers' Open Internet Access

March 9, 2011

Months after the FCC’s December vote to approve the Open Internet Order we’re still talking about net neutrality. Nonstop.
The House Committee on Energy & Commerce Subcommittee on Communications and Technology holds a hearing today on a resolution to express disapproval of the net neutrality rule and, at the hearing’s conclusion, immediately markup and vote on that resolution.
The Internet content marketplace is innovative and vibrant and stands in stark contrast to the closed off markets of yesterday’s technologies. And it drives the cable and telephone companies crazy. So much so that they beg Congress to protect them from ever having to innovate or compete with online content or applications from innovative firms like Netflix, Skype, and YouTube.
The resolution of disapproval will pass the House, but that’s it. It surely won’t be passed by the Senate or signed by the President. The hearing is little more than a distraction from the real work at hand this year for the Congress on technology issues: spectrum auction authority and privacy.
Of course there is still plenty of room for mischief. Actions by the Subcommittee could cripple the effectiveness of the FCC moving forward and create a more uncertain regulatory environment for firms in the online marketplace, discouraging investment, innovation, and job creation.
One has to question the Subcommittee’s rationale for undermining an independent agency. As an independent agency the FCC is structured to be outside the usual Washington partisan wrangling. The fact that the vast majority of FCC decisions are unanimous, with the agreement of both Democratic and Republican commissioners suggests it is largely immune from partisan rancor. Congress’ efforts to politicize the FCC may have the damning effect of delegitimizing and creating ideologically based hurdles in an agency that historically has been a model for responsible and data oriented policy solutions. Creating a toxic and partisan environment in an agency responsible for such dynamic sectors of our economy is exactly the wrong action.
Additionally, remember all the talk over the last two years about how the anemic economic recovery was due to regulatory uncertainty? Welcome to regulatory uncertainty 2.0 – courtesy of the House GOP. After more than a year of negotiations on net neutrality rules, last December the FCC finally came to an agreement with Internet content providers, wireless carriers, and broadband Internet access providers on some simple rules of the road. Those rules created regulatory certainty that the House now seems intent on upending, which will undoubtedly lead to reduced investment, innovation, and job creation in the Internet content and applications sectors. Why would inventors and investors waste their time when they know Internet access providers will block the most lucrative parts of the online marketplace from reaching consumers?
Finally there has been much consternation that the FCC rule is prophylactic in addressing harms that haven’t yet materialized. This might be a reasonable argument for opponents of the net neutrality rules if only it weren’t so intellectually dishonest. Opponents of “prophylactic” rulemaking argue, without irony, that the rule could potentially harm investment in broadband networks by the large incumbent cable and telephone providers that serve most Americans. They argue that the new rule could potentially, sometime, in the future, maybe harm their desire to build out their incredibly lucrative broadband networks for which millions of Americans pay, on average, about $50 per month to access. So, in effect they’re asking for prophylactic Congressional action in a scenario wherein they haven’t yet experienced harm. Congress should respond by telling those firms to come back when they can show actual damages that aren’t outweighed by the benefits to consumers and the rest of the economy.
Wednesday’s Congressional hearing on the net neutrality rules is a futile exercise. Congress will not ultimately rescind the rules – but its impact may not prove to be painless for Internet driven economic growth.

Related Articles

CCIA, INCOMPAS File FCC Comments On 12GHz for 5G

Jul 7, 2021

Washington — The Computer & Communications Industry Association and INCOMPAS filed FCC comments today highlighting data that shows opening this mid-band spectrum would accelerate mobile market competition, bolster the economy and strengthen America’s 5G edge. CCIA has advocated for high speed, affordable internet access for more than 25 years. The following can be attributed to…

CCIA Submits Filing To FCC On Rural Broadband Funds, Auction

Jun 16, 2021

Washington — Washington — The Computer and Communications Industry Association submitted comments to the FCC asking it examine the results of its Phase I Rural Digital Opportunity Fund (RDOF) auction to ensure that these funds, which are supposed to provide funding for areas currently unserved by broadband, are allocated for only eligible locations. The limited…

CCIA Applauds FCC Notice of Proposed Rulemaking on 12GHz Band of Spectrum

Dec 30, 2020

Washington– FCC Chairman Ajit Pai has circulated an NPRM to the Commission to consider the best use of the 12GHz band of spectrum.  CCIA has supported such an NPRM to leverage this band of spectrum for fifth generation (“5G”) wireless broadband purposes.  The following statement can be attributed to CCIA President Matt Schruers: “CCIA applauds…