CCIA Supports Digital Goods Tax Fairness Act

BY CCIA Staff
May 24, 2011

On May 23, the House Judiciary Committee’s Courts, Commercial and Administrative Law Subcommittee held a hearing on H.R. 1860, the Digital Goods and Services Tax Fairness Act.  The bill would establish a national framework for how state and local taxes apply to digital goods and digital services so as to prevent multiple and discriminatory taxation.  CCIA supports the bill as a way to provide certainty and fairness to the growing digital marketplace and to stop, what is in effect, the punitive taxation of innovation.

H.R. 1860 was introduced by Rep. Lamar Smith (R-TX) and Rep. Steve Cohen (D-TN).  Similar legislation has been introduced in the Senate by Sen. Ron Wyden (D-OR) and Sen. John Thune (R-SD).  It is intended to address the fact that the market for digital goods and services transcends physical borders and therefore does not fit well with traditional tax jurisdictions.  As the Download Fairness Coalition (of which CCIA is a member) points out, “For example, if you live in Colorado and you make an online purchase of an app in Virginia, and the company from whom you bought the app has their servers located in Texas, any and all of those states could lay claim to the right to tax your purchase.”  The framework laid out in H.R. 1860 specifies the customer’s tax address as the jurisdiction with the right to tax a digital transaction (destination sourcing), and also prohibits the taxation of digital goods and services at a higher rate than similar non-digital goods and services.

Electronic commerce and the digital marketplace have enabled online businesses and their customers to dramatically broaden the scope of their activities beyond traditional geographic limitations.  CCIA has long held that such innovation is to be encouraged, not penalized.  The exploitation of the digital market’s extra-geographic nature by multiple jurisdictions would be a shortsighted sacrifice of tomorrow’s marketplace for today’s revenue.

During yesterday’s hearing, Rep. Cohen mentioned the fact that a religious group had predicted the world would end over the weekend, and stated that it seemed as if some opponents of the bill were predicting the world would end if it passed.  H.R. 1860 would not end anything, but rather would provide for the continued development of a new and innovative marketplace.

Related Articles

CCIA, Industry Groups File Complaint Against Maryland Digital Tax

Feb 18, 2021

Washington — The Computer & Communications Industry Association and a coalition of trade associations joined in filing a federal complaint against Maryland’s recent Act imposing a “Digital Advertising Gross Revenues Tax”, aimed at technology companies. The Act attempts to collect an estimated $250 million from a small number of companies in the first year, according…

CCIA Congratulates Nobel Laureates For Economic Model For FCC Spectrum Auctions

Oct 13, 2020

Washington — This year’s Nobel Prize in economics has been awarded to two Stanford University professors who came up with the economic model that governments around the world now use to auction spectrum used for everything from broadcast stations to high speed internet. Before Paul Milgrom and Robert Wilson developed a new theory for spectrum…

House Judiciary Antitrust Subcommittee Proposal Calls For Competition Policy Changes That Take Aim At Tech Companies, Consumers 

Oct 6, 2020

Washington — House Judiciary antitrust subcommittee chairman David Cicilline has released a Democratic-only proposal targeting several popular tech companies. The recommendations include introducing amendments to the current antitrust system that would not benefit consumers.  Republicans have released a separate Report not supporting some of the most radical democratic recommendations such as mandates to structurally separate…