Fair Use, PROTECT IP, and Common Misconceptions

BY Ali Sternburg
August 2, 2011

When CCIA recently released the 2011 iteration of Fair Use in the U.S. Economy, it was the second update of that report – the first having been released four years ago, as is chronicled on CCIA’s fair use page.  The purpose of the report is to quantifiably demonstrate the U.S. economic contribution of industries relying on fair use, with measured criteria like GDP and employment, applying the same WIPO methodology often used to allege the costs of copyright piracy.

The study is not a response to the recently-introduced PROTECT IP Act, which it pre-dates.  While many valid concerns about PROTECT IP have been voiced, the PROTECT IP Act is not ostensibly designed to limit fair use.  However, the fair use doctrine and other limitations on copyright are crucial safe harbors for individuals and groups, and any expansion of copyright, with the PROTECT IP Act as the latest example, may undermine the economic activity associated with those exceptions.  (The study defines “fair use” to include both fair use and related limitations and exceptions to copyright.)  These limitations provide an environment for innovation and creation, and facilitate building on what has come before, especially with the Internet and new ways for sharing and collaborating.

Judges have handed down several key decisions that allowed technology companies to continue to provide services that people rely on daily in their businesses and personal lives; even though incidental copying is involved, such copying is considered fair use.  See, e.g., Field v. Google Inc., 412 F. Supp. 2d 1106 (D. Nev. 2006); Perfect 10, Inc. v. Amazon.com, Inc., 508 F.3d 1146 (9th Cir. 2007). Meanwhile, the sites that PROTECT IP claims to target (albeit imperfectly) are generally not making uses that have been acknowledged by courts as fair use.  Unfortunately, while PROTECT IP is not directly aimed at search and e-commerce sites, it nevertheless aims to regulate their activities in its pursuit of infringement by others.  This could negatively impact reliance on the fair use doctrine, if service providers choose to be overly cautious in taking down potentially infringing content because of fear of secondary liability.

It is also worthy to note that exercising the right to make fair use of a copyrighted work and relying on copyright are not mutually exclusive.  Many industries counted among the fair use industries are both rightsholders and users of protected content, a fact which demonstrates the wide range of industrial applications of fair use.  It would be wrong to suggest that people who rely on fair use and limitations on copyright as part of their job cannot—and do not—also rely on the protections of copyright for their own products.  This epitomizes the goal of a balanced copyright regime.

Related Articles

Unvetted Copyright Measures In Spending Bill Concern CCIA

Dec 22, 2020

Washington — Congress has wrapped several controversial copyright measures into a must-pass end of the year spending bill.  The intellectual property part of the legislation includes the CASE Act, the Trademark Modernization Act, and the Protecting Lawful Streaming Act. While the Computer & Communications Industry Association doesn’t oppose the language of the streaming proposal, it…

CCIA Response To Proposed Digital Copyright Act

Dec 22, 2020

Washington — Senator Thom Tillis, R-NC, has introduced a discussion draft of a controversial copyright bill that reads like a Christmas wish list for Hollywood and big content companies, and takes cues from contentious copyright reforms in Europe. Among other sweeping changes to the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA), the bill increases the role of…

Senate Judiciary Considers Controversial Copyright And Section 230 Legislation

Dec 10, 2020

Washington — Controversial legislation combining flawed copyright and Section 230 bills was considered by the Senate Judiciary Committee today before being withdrawn. The Computer & Communications Industry Association has serious concerns with S. 4632 (the Online Content Policy Modernization Act), which is a bill containing S. 1273 (the Copyright Alternative in Small-Claims Enforcement (CASE) Act…