AT&T to Verizon : “We’ll Keep the World Safe for Big Telecom Mergers, You Go Kill That Pesky FCC Open Internet Rule”

BY CCIA Staff
September 28, 2011

Ahh, the co-ordinated effects possible between two giant duopolists.
Now that the trial schedule has been set for the new 21st century U.S. v. AT&T antitrust case, AT&T litigators will be vigorously defending in court the iconic behmoth’s right to acquire and thereby eliminate one of its three national mobile telecom competitors, T-Mobile.  If successful, the acquisition will go a long way toward clearing a path for a future Verizon takeover of a smaller competitor or competitors.   Verizon knows that, and so even though AT&T would be leapfrogging it in size and market share with this transaction, they’re cool with it.  Maybe even supportive.  The trial date is set for February 13th.
Meanwhile, back at the FCC, AT&T still has to work hard to win parallel approval for its merger, due to the transfers of wireless licenses involved.  An agency self-imposed 180-day shot clock is running again, but nobody really thinks the FCC will issue a decision ahead of the antitrust court determination.
What the FCC has just accomplished this month is publication in the Federal Register of its first rule to maintain public access to the open Internet.   That’s where Verizon comes in.  Its first court challenge to the open Internet rule failed because it was filed prematurely, but a brand new opportunity presents itself here.   Verizon is expected to challenge the FCC again early next month, and argue that the DC Circuit should have exclusive jurisdiction, and that the FCC has no authority to promulgate rules governing broadband Internet access.   AT&T is totally cool with all of this as well.
Further, now that the FCC rule has been published, the clock is also ticking in the Senate on a Resolution of Disapproval under the Congressional Review Act. (CRA).   A resolution to repeal the FCC open Internet rule already passed the House earlier this year, but now it will be ripe for consideration by the full Senate (under CRA waiver of all regular procedures involving Committee action and cloture votes etc…) anytime after October 13th.   Word is AT&T will not be lobbying their Senate friends to whom they’ve been trying to sell the T-Mo merger, but no matter, Verizon again has it covered.
Throughout all of this, it’s mostly the same smaller carriers, online search engines and e-commerce companies, along with the same public interest groups that comprise the loyal opposition.   Legal, regulatory and public relations resources on this side do not begin to match those of either AT&T or Verizon alone, much less combined.
Hopefully the law will protect the public interest anyway.

Related Articles

New Study Shows Microsoft Holds 85% Market Share in U.S. Public Sector Productivity Software

Sep 21, 2021

Washington — A new study conducted by Omdia has found Microsoft’s share in the U.S. government office productivity software market to be approximately 85 percent, more than seven times the share of the next largest competitor. The research report outlines a number of consequences to the U.S. government’s overreliance on a single vendor, including higher…

CCIA Whitepaper Identifies National Security Risks Posed By House Bills Targeting U.S. Tech Companies

Sep 13, 2021

Washington — The Computer & Communications Industry Association has released a white paper on the national security implications of several House-passed bills aimed at a handful of U.S. tech companies as they compete with foreign companies. These bills were introduced in June 2021 and were marked up without legislative hearings or input from stakeholders, particularly…

CCIA Requests Hearing on Senate Antitrust Venue Bill Ahead of Markup

Aug 10, 2021

Washington — The Computer & Communications Industry Association sent a letter today asking the Senate Judiciary Committee to hold a hearing on S. 1787, State Antitrust Enforcement Venue Act of 2021. Antitrust litigation often involves multiple states which, absent the possibility to centralize under one venue, would risk having balkanized antitrust judgments with multiple and…