Another Bill To Tax Online Sales Introduced In House

October 20, 2011

Last week saw the introduction in the U.S. House of Representatives of another bill aimed at requiring online retailers to collect sales taxes from customers regardless of whether they have a physical presence in that state.  This latest bill, H.R. 3179 (the Marketplace Equity Act), was introduced by Rep. Steve Womack (R-AR) and Rep. Jackie Speier (D-CA).  It is similar to the Main Street Fairness Act introduced in July by Sen. Dick Durbin (D-IL) in the Senate and by Rep. John Conyers (D-MI) in the House.

CCIA expressed its opposition to the Main Street Fairness Act because it would, in the name of “fairness”, effectively force electronic commerce to conform to a tax framework established on geographic location and physical presence, negating the advantages and benefits derived from innovation.  The Marketplace Equity Act differs in that it sets forth certain simplification requirements that states would have to satisfy.  These requirements include:

  • A single tax base and exemption structure throughout the state;
  • A small seller exemption of $1 million in yearly national remote sales or $100,000 within the state;
  • Rate structure to be (a) single statewide blended rate (state rate + local rate); (b) maximum state rate; or (c) applicable destination rate.  (c) would retain the different local jurisdictional rates but in this case, the State would have to make available adequate software to remote sellers that substantially eases the collection burden.

While this is more specific than leaving it up to the Streamlined Sales Tax Project as the Main Street Fairness Act does, the objective is the same in that it seeks to unfairly place a compliance burden on online retailers for daring to utilize a new legitimate business model that does not fit well with a sales tax system based on physical location.  It is neither fair nor equitable to blame innovators for the strain caused by trying to stuff a 21st century business model into a 20th century tax framework.  State governments find themselves in dire budgetary straits and it is understandable for them to be seeking new revenue.  However, their policies should be aimed at fostering innovation and progress rather than a parasitic quest for a convenient cash cow.

Related Articles

New EU Distribution Rules Allow Discrimination Against Online Commerce

Jul 9, 2021

Brussels, BELGIUM — The European Commission has published its draft revisions to distribution rules known as the Vertical Block Exemption Regulation and the Vertical Guidelines (“VBER”). The VBER covers so-called vertical agreements between suppliers and their retailers or distributors. The updated rules replace the current rules on June 1, 2022. Digital distribution models have been…

CCIA Tech Industry Delegation Meets Incoming German EU Presidency, Shares Recommendations

Mar 9, 2020

Berlin, Germany — The Computer & Communications Industry Association is leading a delegation of tech companies to meet with German politicians and senior officials ahead of Germany taking over the Presidency of the Council of the EU on July 1. CCIA Europe will also present its EU tech policy recommendations published today.   Germany takes…

DHS Issues Report On Counterfeit Products

Jan 24, 2020

Washington — The U.S. Department of Homeland Security has issued its report to the White House regarding proposed action on addressing counterfeits and pirated goods in online marketplaces. This follows a Presidential Memorandum from last April on “Combating Trafficking in Counterfeit and Pirated Goods”, which tasked Commerce and DHS to prepare a report with a…