Tech Industry Applauds U.S. Confronting China On Rare Earth Minerals

BY CCIA Staff
March 14, 2012

The Computer & Communications Industry Association welcomes the President’s decision to directly confront China on the issue of rare earth minerals.  The request for consultations is the first step in bringing a trade case at the World Trade Organization (WTO).

China imposes various export restrictions on these minerals, which are used to manufacture high-tech products such as advanced electronics.  Such restrictions, including export quotas and export duties, artificially increase prices for high-tech manufacturers outside China to the advantage of domestic Chinese manufacturers in violation of their international commitments.  In addition, these policies seek to coerce foreign manufacturers to locate their production in China, leading to technology transfers.

CCIA believes that China’s export restrictions are part of a continuing pattern of flouting trade rules to achieve commercial advantage over foreign competitors.  China uses social morals to attempt to justify its Internet censorship of foreign sites while domestic sites carry the same banned content.  Similarly, China uses environmental protection as a pretext for its rare earth minerals policy yet insists on an approach discriminating against foreign entities.

With China accounting for more than 90 percent of the current rare earth mineral supply, it is imperative in this era of global supply chains that China be prevented from extorting from global tech companies in violation of international trade rules.  Previous success in holding China accountable on its discriminatory practices has always needed concerted action with like-minded allies, and we are encouraged that the European Union and Japan are joining the U.S. in this action as well.

The following statement can be attributed to Computer & Communications Industry Association President & CEO Ed Black:

“CCIA believes that the unimpeded operation of global supply chains, whether it be goods, services or the free flow of information, is a prerequisite for 21st century trade, and we applaud our government’s efforts in pursuing this goal.

“Obama’s action represents a good first step in dealing with China’s unfair competitive practices, but more needs to be done.  Besides flouting international commitments and impeding access to the materials needed to build the high-tech gadgets of tomorrow, China also restricts the medium that makes these gadgets valuable – the Internet.  A comprehensive trade action plan to address China’s unfair attempts to hinder foreign companies in the fast-evolving high-tech space must also address China’s rampant and unjustified Internet restrictions.”

 

Related Articles

New Study Shows Microsoft Holds 85% Market Share in U.S. Public Sector Productivity Software

Sep 21, 2021

Washington — A new study conducted by Omdia has found Microsoft’s share in the U.S. government office productivity software market to be approximately 85 percent, more than seven times the share of the next largest competitor. The research report outlines a number of consequences to the U.S. government’s overreliance on a single vendor, including higher…

CCIA Whitepaper Identifies National Security Risks Posed By House Bills Targeting U.S. Tech Companies

Sep 13, 2021

Washington — The Computer & Communications Industry Association has released a white paper on the national security implications of several House-passed bills aimed at a handful of U.S. tech companies as they compete with foreign companies. These bills were introduced in June 2021 and were marked up without legislative hearings or input from stakeholders, particularly…

CCIA Requests Hearing on Senate Antitrust Venue Bill Ahead of Markup

Aug 10, 2021

Washington — The Computer & Communications Industry Association sent a letter today asking the Senate Judiciary Committee to hold a hearing on S. 1787, State Antitrust Enforcement Venue Act of 2021. Antitrust litigation often involves multiple states which, absent the possibility to centralize under one venue, would risk having balkanized antitrust judgments with multiple and…