Tensions Rise in Global Battle Over Internet Freedom as UN Discusses Human Rights Online

BY Matthias Langenegger
March 7, 2012

In the global battle over the future of the Internet countries that stand for an open, dynamic web with minimal regulation and limits on free expression are increasingly under pressure from authoritative States seeking greater control over its infrastructure and content. Here is a snapshot from the front lines.

On 29th February in Geneva, the UN’s Human Rights Council (HRC), the most influential international human rights body, had a panel discussion dedicated to Internet Freedom for the first time.

Attendees witnessed a rare episode of very undiplomatic political drama as the diverging views on free expression online between the West and a large group of authoritarian States went on display – as totalitarian states took the gloves off to make clear that their long-term effort to control the net knows no institutional boundaries.

From the beginning, the meeting was characterized by confrontation and deliberate efforts to disrupt the session. When Al Jazeera’s Riz Khan, the moderator, began introducing the panelists, the Cuban delegate took his country’s nameplate and banged it on his desk to raise a point of order (a procedural ‘motion’ that is often used to disrupt meetings as it requires an immediate ruling by the Chair). Cuba requested the Chairman to explain whether the session was formally part of the HCR session. The Chairman’s affirmation was followed by more flag-banging to request that the session be led by an official member of the Council and not by an external moderator, a request that the Chairman dismissed.

Russia followed up, loudly banging the table to request the moderator to respect the rules of procedure and not turn the session into a “TV talkshow”. (click here to watch the video of the Russian intervention – unfortunately edited to remove the drama of the ‘flag-banging’).

By the end of the 2.5 hour session, six countries, including Russia, China and Cuba, had raised a total of seven points of order. A long-time observer of the HRC noted that points of order are rare at the HRC and that the tone used by countries attacking the session leaders and trying to undermine the session was unusually abrasive for the HRC, where even strong disagreements are generally couched in polite ‘diplomat-speak’.

A number of panellists, including UN High Commissioner for Human RightsNavi Pillay, Swedish Foreign Minister Bildt, UN Special Rapporteur on Freedom of Expression Frank La Rue, Google’s Bill Echikson, Anriette Esterhuysen from the Association for Progressive Communication, US Ambassador Donahoe and other Western Governments made passionate and very strong calls to protect freedom of expression and other human rights online and stressed the importance of corresponding safeguards such as due process of law and safe harbor provisions for intermediaries.

The many countries with contrary views, led by China and Russia, published a Joint Statement (full text here and video here) with 28 other countries, including North Korea, Iran, Saudi Arabia, Sudan and Zimbabwe. “The Internet”, the Chinese delegate noted,  “is often used to propagate terrorism, extremism….  and even ideas of toppling legitimate authorities… [and] is used by some groups to distort fact, exaggerate situation and provoke violence…”. The Statement also sets out their vision for the web of the future: “The Internet industry should act to foster a crime free, reliable and secure cyberspace…” and “Governments should strengthen legislation in efforts of Internet regulation and law enforcement activities…”

This is only the second time China has delivered a joint statement in the HRC, which may indicate that they are starting to assume a more assertive role for the unfortunately large group of countries that sees the Internet as increasingly threatening.

The positions expressed in the HRC are also congruent with these same countries’ efforts to use issues like spam, cybercrime, IPR infringement and child pornography as a pretext to call for broad surveillance of online activities and increased Government control of the Internet’s infrastructure and policy-making frameworks. This agenda is being pursued across Geneva-based UN organs including those concerned with telecommunications (ITU), Intellectual Property (WIPO) and Internet Government-related forums (IGF, CSTD).

If you would like to read more about this long-standing struggle for the future of the net, and why 2012 is such an important year for these issues, please click here.

Related Articles

EU Top Court Strikes Down Privacy Shield, CCIA Calls for Urgent Legal Certainty and Solutions

Jul 16, 2020

Brussels, BELGIUM — The European Court of Justice (CJEU) issued a landmark ruling today that invalidates Privacy Shield, a key legal mechanism which thousands of companies use to transfer commercial data from the EU to the United States. The CJEU ruled that the Privacy Shield decision does not comply with EU law. Among other things,…

CCIA Provides Input to the EU’s Future Proposals on the Digital Services Act and Competition Tools

Jun 30, 2020

Brussels, BELGIUM — The Computer & Communications Industry Association welcomes the opportunity to respond to the European Commission’s calls for feedback on its future Digital Services Act (internal market rules and ex-ante measures) and proposal for new competition tools. The European Commission is expected to present legislative proposals before the end of the year. CCIA…

Court Ruling Rejects Core of French Hate Speech Law

Jun 18, 2020

Brussels, BELGIUM — Today the French Constitutional Court published its decision on the French “Avia Law” aimed at combating hate speech online. The Computer & Communications Industry Association (CCIA) welcomes the decision as it highlights the key role of the freedom of expression for a democratic society and calls for a more proportionate approach. The…