Trend Towards Copyright Reform For The Benefit Of Innovation Continues in Europe

BY CCIA Staff
May 11, 2012

As Europe debates the balance of intellectual property rights in the wake of ACTA, Ireland is taking comments through the end of this month on a paper it published on copyright and innovation.

Despite the various pressures to increase copyright enforcement online without due regard for negative side-effects, it is very encouraging to see that various Member States take the seemingly opposite route: they engage in serious debates of how a more flexible IPR regime can spur creativity and innovative output.

Currently, one of the most advanced developments can be seen in Ireland. Last year the Irish government set up the Copyright Review Committee, which published a Consultation Paper on copyright and innovation this year. This paper remains subject to a public consultation until the end of May 2012. In tune with Member States like the UK and the Netherlands, the paper rightly asks in how far a modernization and adaptation to copyright laws to the digital age can incentivize innovations.

In this context, it is very encouraging to see that the Committee places ‘innovation intermediaries’ at the heart of innovative advancement. They “facilitate innovation by bringing together a range of different players to […] co-ordinate innovation” and technology in particular “can facilitate the potentially vast area of collaborative innovation, by bringing the various players together online.” However, if technology is to play that role up to date copyright laws are indispensible. To this end, the Review Committee brings forward a couple of important proposals.

A key point is the Committee’s conviction that the incorporation of all the exceptions and limitations to copyright contained in the Copyright Directive into Irish law will lead to an overall net gain to innovation, and digital innovation in particular. As one example the committee cites the services offered by search engines which can be subject to copyright infringement due to the quotation of even a small few words.

 

The Committee is very outspoken about such anachronisms between the law and the reality of the Internet. It clearly sees search results as a new, original work that is substantially different from the websites quoted and linked to. “Not only does this search not conflict with the normal exploitation of the websites being quoted and linked to, or unreasonably prejudice the legitimate interests of the owners of those sites, the potential of driving internet traffic to those sites is a benefit to them”. Online search is just one example of online innovation and a key function of the law must be to allow future innovations that no one even thinks of at this point in time. The Committee recognized that exceptions and limitations to copyright are crucial in this respect since copyright law should not stifle innovative business models.

 

In contrast to the proposals in the Netherlands and the UK, it is interesting to see that the Irish Review Committee is far more receptive to a ‘fair use’ concept as found in the US legal tradition. Against the background of both Ireland’s shared common law heritage with other EU Member States and their common EU membership, it doesn’t see why a transplant of the doctrine should fail per se. This statement itself is already indicative of the Committees strong persuasion that the country is in need of fundamental copyright reform to not only adapt the laws to the digital era but also to possibly gain a long-term competitive advantage over other countries in the European and international context.

 

What is needed at this point is more empirical evidence in how a more flexible copyright regime drives innovation and economic growth as requested by the Review Committee. In the last years CCIA has published studies in the European as well as in the US context concerning the considerable economic contribution of industries relying on exceptions and limitations to copyright and the fair use doctrine in the EU and US respectively. These studies clearly show that creativity and innovation do not only rely on strong IPRs, but also to a great extent on exceptions and limitations to these exclusive rights. Ireland’s consultation paper is a big step in the right direction. Hopefully other Member States will show the same amount of courage.

Related Articles

CCIA Responds to the European Commission Consultation on Article 17 of the Copyright Directive

Sep 10, 2020

Brussels, BELGIUM –The Computer & Communications Industry Association offered comments on the implementation of Article 17 of the Copyright Directive today. CCIA’s comments include elements such as the scope of services covered, how online content-sharing service providers have to provide their ‘best efforts’ to obtain rightsholders’ authorisation, and avoiding unauthorised content online.  After months of…

CCIA Supports an EU Risk-Based Approach to AI in Comments

Sep 10, 2020

The Computer & Communications Industry Association submitted comments today to the European Commission’s roadmap consultation on Artificial Intelligence (AI). The Commission is expected to present a legislative proposal in Q1 2021. In its comments CCIA welcomes the Commission’s aim to “create trust and incentivise the use of such AI systems by citizens and businesses”. It…

CCIA Responds to Public Consultation on EU Proposal for a New Competition Tool

Sep 8, 2020

Brussels, BELGIUM –The Computer & Communications Industry Association offered comments on the European Commission’s public consultation on the forthcoming proposals for a new complementary tool to strengthen competition enforcement (“NCT”) today. The consultation questions cover a wide range of issues around perceived gaps in the current EU competition rules, particularly those related to what are…