CCIA Applauds Administration Warning On IP Bill

BY CCIA Staff
September 24, 2012

In a letter to the chairman and ranking member of the Senate Judiciary Committee yesterday, the Department of Justice and Department of Commerce express concerns with a provision in S. 3325, the Enforcement of Intellectual Property Rights Act.

They say that despite the bill’s good intentions, the way it is written, it would turn DOJ attorneys into pro bono copyright lawyers for big content providers.

They write in the letter that “Title 1’s departure from the settled framework above could result in Department of Justice prosecutors serving as pro bono lawyers for private copyright holders regardless of their resources. In effect, taxpayer-supported Department lawyers would pursue lawsuits for copyright holders, with monetary recovery going to industry.”

“At a time when U.S. taxpayers are on hook to rescue the financial industry, why should they also foot the bill for the content industry’s financial fees?” said Computer & Communications Industry Association President Ed Black. “We appreciate Justice and Commerce alerting Congress to this flaw and support the administration’s efforts to fix this bill. This content protection legislation isn’t ready for prime time.”

“This legislation would involve the government more deeply in what are often complicated disputes between industry and consumers. The DOJ’s resources are needed to fight the more serious problems including, crime, terrorism and antitrust abuses,” Black said.

“We urge members on a bipartisan basis to heed this letter. It is an instance in which the Administration’s position is in line with the public interest and that of consumers,” Black said.

The House has already passed a version of the IP protection legislation. The Senate is considering voting any day by unanimous consent on S. 3325, which was recently approved by the Judiciary Committee.

Related Articles

Supreme Court Decides Landmark Google v. Oracle Case On Copyright, Interoperable Tech Products

Apr 5, 2021

Washington — The Supreme Court has issued its ruling in the Google v. Oracle copyright case, which has been litigated for more than a decade. The outcome, which has sweeping implications for the tech industry, means the reuse of certain program elements necessary for interoperability is fair use and not an infringement of copyright law.…

Unvetted Copyright Measures In Spending Bill Concern CCIA

Dec 22, 2020

Washington — Congress has wrapped several controversial copyright measures into a must-pass end of the year spending bill.  The intellectual property part of the legislation includes the CASE Act, the Trademark Modernization Act, and the Protecting Lawful Streaming Act. While the Computer & Communications Industry Association doesn’t oppose the language of the streaming proposal, it…

CCIA Response To Proposed Digital Copyright Act

Dec 22, 2020

Washington — Senator Thom Tillis, R-NC, has introduced a discussion draft of a controversial copyright bill that reads like a Christmas wish list for Hollywood and big content companies, and takes cues from contentious copyright reforms in Europe. Among other sweeping changes to the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA), the bill increases the role of…