CCIA Files Surveillance Comments with President’s Review Group

October 8, 2013

Late last week, CCIA submitted a set of comments to the President’s Review Group on Intelligence Collection and Communications Technologies in response to their call for feedback on September 4th. This group was formed by the President in August and tasked with examining our current surveillance practices and reporting on how they can be improved to protect privacy and reestablish Americans’ trust in government while maintaining national security.

In our comments we reemphasized the importance of transparency in the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, including the release of secret legal opinions that interpret the law, and permitting our member companies and others like them to report aggregate statistics on how many FISA and related orders they receive. We also advocated for an institutional opponent to the government which would provide an alternate viewpoint for the court, as well as hopefully a source of technological expertise in an era when so much intelligence gathering relies is deeply wrapped up in modern technology.

CCIA also took this opportunity to emphasize to the Administration the effects of talking about US surveillance only in terms of US citizens. Too many times the government has responded to questions about surveillance powers by focusing on the protections for Americans under the current system. While that is no doubt important, in our comments we made clear that, on a global network and in a globalized age, that kind of thinking just isn’t enough. All of our members have users around the world, and refusing to discuss the impact of these policies on that population risks alienating a large portion of the world’s Internet users. We believe that would be a great blow to the charge of Internet freedom and to American commerce.

Finally, our comments took the first step of calling for an evaluation of substantive changes to the laws governing national security surveillance. While there is still so much we don’t know due to a lack of transparency, it would be a shame if America did not take this opportunity to reevaluate the authorities we give to the government, how those are used, and whether there are better ways to preserve privacy without hampering national security.

We are eager to see the result of the Review Group’s initial work and to continue contributing to the ongoing national discussion of national security surveillance in the future.

Related Articles

White House Expected To Issue Executive Order Targeting Online Speech

May 28, 2020

Washington – According to various news reports, President Trump is expected to issue an executive order seeking to roll back the liability protections that have allowed users to post content online.  Reports of an executive order come days after Twitter applied a fact-check notice adjacent to accusations from President Trump via Twitter about alleged voter…

CCIA Supports House Amendment to Protect Americans’ Browsing Data from Warrantless Collection

May 26, 2020

Washington — The House is expected to vote this week on a bipartisan amendment to H.R. 6172, the “USA FREEDOM Reauthorization Act of 2020.” The amendment, brought by Representatives Lofgren (D-CA) and Davidson (R-OH), would protect Americans’ private internet browsing and search data from warrantless collection under Section 215 of the USA PATRIOT Act. A…

Senate Advances USA FREEDOM Reauthorization Act with New Surveillance Reforms

May 14, 2020

Washington — The Senate has voted to reauthorize expired authorities allowing federal government surveillance of Americans with additional reforms to legislation that the House previously passed. The Computer & Communications Industry Association has fought the unreasonable expansion of government surveillance for more than a decade. The following can be attributed to CCIA President Matt Schruers:…