Judge Supports Google Books As Fair Use, Ruling A Win For Transformative Tech Online

BY Heather Greenfield
November 14, 2013

Washington — A judge has issued a long-awaited ruling that paves the way for search engines and others to allow users to search published books just like they search the Internet.  The Authors Guild and others brought a copyright suit against Google eight years ago for a book scanning project that offered excerpts of books in response to a user’s query.

In his ruling today, Judge Denny Chin said book scanning was “fair use” because it expanded information available to everyone from researchers to readers to the blind and didn’t harm the market for the original work.

Chin stated in his ruling:

“In my view, Google Books provides significant public benefits. It advances the progress of the arts and sciences, while maintaining respectful consideration for the rights of authors and other creative individuals, and without adversely impacting the rights of copyright holders.”

The Google Books decision demonstrates the importance and value of fair use to the public.  Companies can now invest money and time in creating tools that benefit the public without seeking permission from gatekeepers, if their efforts are transformative, which can involve copying and digitizing entire works.  The court also pointed out that these efforts can help the authors to sell more works, noting that “by helping readers and researchers identify books, Google Books benefits authors and publishers. . . . Hence, Google Books will generate new audiences and create new sources of income.”

The Computer & Communications Industry Association had filed briefs in this lawsuit arguing that in addition to it being the right interpretation of U.S. fair use laws that this would be a win for consumers.

The following statement may be attributed to CCIA’s VP for Law & Policy, Matt Schruers:

“This ruling is a vindication for transformative technologies online.  Judge Chin’s opinion makes unmistakably clear that the public’s access to revolutionary tools like Book Search, which advance research and understanding, and expand access to underserved populations, should not be limited by formalistic objections to scanning and indexing.”

For more information on this case, please see Ali Sternburg’s blog post on the Disruptive Competition Project blog.

Related Articles

Supreme Court Decides Landmark Google v. Oracle Case On Copyright, Interoperable Tech Products

Apr 5, 2021

Washington — The Supreme Court has issued its ruling in the Google v. Oracle copyright case, which has been litigated for more than a decade. The outcome, which has sweeping implications for the tech industry, means the reuse of certain program elements necessary for interoperability is fair use and not an infringement of copyright law.…

Unvetted Copyright Measures In Spending Bill Concern CCIA

Dec 22, 2020

Washington — Congress has wrapped several controversial copyright measures into a must-pass end of the year spending bill.  The intellectual property part of the legislation includes the CASE Act, the Trademark Modernization Act, and the Protecting Lawful Streaming Act. While the Computer & Communications Industry Association doesn’t oppose the language of the streaming proposal, it…

CCIA Response To Proposed Digital Copyright Act

Dec 22, 2020

Washington — Senator Thom Tillis, R-NC, has introduced a discussion draft of a controversial copyright bill that reads like a Christmas wish list for Hollywood and big content companies, and takes cues from contentious copyright reforms in Europe. Among other sweeping changes to the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA), the bill increases the role of…