Judge Supports Google Books As Fair Use, Ruling A Win For Transformative Tech Online

BY Heather Greenfield
November 14, 2013

Washington — A judge has issued a long-awaited ruling that paves the way for search engines and others to allow users to search published books just like they search the Internet.  The Authors Guild and others brought a copyright suit against Google eight years ago for a book scanning project that offered excerpts of books in response to a user’s query.

In his ruling today, Judge Denny Chin said book scanning was “fair use” because it expanded information available to everyone from researchers to readers to the blind and didn’t harm the market for the original work.

Chin stated in his ruling:

“In my view, Google Books provides significant public benefits. It advances the progress of the arts and sciences, while maintaining respectful consideration for the rights of authors and other creative individuals, and without adversely impacting the rights of copyright holders.”

The Google Books decision demonstrates the importance and value of fair use to the public.  Companies can now invest money and time in creating tools that benefit the public without seeking permission from gatekeepers, if their efforts are transformative, which can involve copying and digitizing entire works.  The court also pointed out that these efforts can help the authors to sell more works, noting that “by helping readers and researchers identify books, Google Books benefits authors and publishers. . . . Hence, Google Books will generate new audiences and create new sources of income.”

The Computer & Communications Industry Association had filed briefs in this lawsuit arguing that in addition to it being the right interpretation of U.S. fair use laws that this would be a win for consumers.

The following statement may be attributed to CCIA’s VP for Law & Policy, Matt Schruers:

“This ruling is a vindication for transformative technologies online.  Judge Chin’s opinion makes unmistakably clear that the public’s access to revolutionary tools like Book Search, which advance research and understanding, and expand access to underserved populations, should not be limited by formalistic objections to scanning and indexing.”

For more information on this case, please see Ali Sternburg’s blog post on the Disruptive Competition Project blog.

Related Articles

New Copyright Office Leader, Opportunity To Improve Operations

Sep 21, 2020

Washington — Shira Perlmutter has been named as the new Register of Copyrights.  Perlmutter brings new leadership to the U.S. Copyright Office at a time when modernizing its operations for the digital age will be key.  The Computer & Communications Industry Association has noted that modernization of aging Copyright Office systems can ensure that the…

CCIA Responds to the European Commission Consultation on Article 17 of the Copyright Directive

Sep 10, 2020

Brussels, BELGIUM –The Computer & Communications Industry Association offered comments on the implementation of Article 17 of the Copyright Directive today. CCIA’s comments include elements such as the scope of services covered, how online content-sharing service providers have to provide their ‘best efforts’ to obtain rightsholders’ authorisation, and avoiding unauthorised content online.  After months of…

Copyright Office Releases Study On Safe Harbors, Recommends Further Reviews

May 21, 2020

Washington — The Copyright Office released its study today on how copyright provisions within the 1998 Digital Millennium Copyright Act are being used. The study does not recommend wholesale changes to the Section 512 safe harbor system, but identifies areas where Congress may want to step in with legislation. The Computer & Communications Industry Association…