CCIA Welcomes Supreme Court Clarification On Patent Eligibility of Software

BY Heather Greenfield
June 19, 2014

Washington – The Supreme Court issued its ruling today in a key case examining the patent eligibility of software. In a unanimous ruling the court offered some guidance on what an abstract idea is and said that implementing an abstract idea on a generic computer is not an invention eligible for a patent.

The Alice v. CLS Bank ruling could have far reaching implications for a variety of industries as well as the growing business of patent lawsuits, many stemming from patents on software. The Computer & Communications Industry Association (CCIA) had filed an amicus brief in the case asking the court to develop a new test for the patent eligibility of software. The following can be attributed to CCIA President & CEO Ed Black:

“The court has found that taking an idea and implementing it on a computer does not deserve a patent. This is a sound decision ensuring our patent laws are better aligned with the original intent of our founders.  We need to keep in mind that when the Government grants a patent they are authorizing the patent recipient to exercise monopoly power.

“The Justices interpreted the law in a way that will cut back on some flimsy patents without impacting more deserving ones. Better quality patents will help curb the patent troll problem. The U.S. Patent & Trademark Office will now need to issue new guidelines on software patents, and we look forward to reviewing them. Major further reform of the patent system remains a high priority because until fixed, it will too often be an obstacle to innovation rather than a tool for advancing it.”

The following can be attributed to CCIA patent counsel Matt Levy:

“This is an important tool in the fight against patent trolls, but it is not going to solve the problem. The Justices applied their unanimous decision in Mayo to software, as we had hoped they would. Software patents commonly use very generic terms in order to cover any possible computer implementation, and the Federal Circuit was greatly expanding what could be patented. The Court has put the brakes on that expansion and brought some common sense back to the world of software.”

Related Articles

CCIA Welcomes Support From Diverse Group of 38 Organizations and Experts in Continued Effort to Halt Unconstitutional Texas Social Media Law

May 18, 2022

Washington – Just five days after the Computer and Communications Industry Association (CCIA) and NetChoice filed an emergency brief asking the Supreme Court to act immediately against an unconstitutional Texas social media law, a diverse group of 38 organizations and individuals filed a series of “friend of the court” briefs in support of the associations’…

CCIA Files Emergency Brief Asking Supreme Court To Halt Texas Social Media Law

May 13, 2022

Washington – The Computer & Communications Industry Association jointly filed an emergency brief Friday asking the U.S. Supreme Court for immediate action to prevent an unconstitutional Texas social media law from going into effect. The joint filing, submitted with co-plaintiff NetChoice, asks the Court to reinstate a lower court’s decision blocking enforcement of the Texas…

CCIA Files Joint Amicus Brief Asking Court To Re-Hear Standard Essential Patents Case

Apr 21, 2022

Washington – The Computer and Communications Industry Association was joined by The App Association, High Tech Alliance, and the Public Interest Patent Law Institute in filing a joint amici brief Wednesday evening with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit requesting that the Panel re-hear a case involving standard essential patents (SEPs) en…