Will President Take Executive Action On Immigration Reform?

October 29, 2014

With the midterm elections less than a week away, 2014 looks to become another in a long line of years in which action to address the crisis in skilled immigration does not come to pass. This is especially disappointing since the 113th Congress actually saw active discussion of, and some legislative progress on, the issue of immigration reform. While the Senate passed a comprehensive immigration reform bill in June 2013, House Republicans have been unwilling to take floor action even on the piecemeal reform bills they have passed out of committee. As hopes for House action on reform further faded in the aftermath of the border crisis over the summer, attention has shifted to the possibility of executive action. The administration is reportedly considering the inclusion of skilled immigration components in such action, and we are hopeful that it will result in a meaningful amelioration of the skilled immigration crisis we face.

While much of the discussion on executive action has focused on deportation and the undocumented, other aspects of immigration should also be included. The comprehensive reform effort in Congress, which the administration has supported, included reforms of the legal immigration system as well as addressing the undocumented. It would make sense for executive action on reform to also take a comprehensive approach.

If the issue of illegal immigration, whether how to address the long-term presence of the undocumented population or the summer surge of unaccompanied minors from Central America, is a crisis in need of immediate action, our industry faces no less of a crisis in our inability to access needed foreign talent. Every year that goes by without addressing the chronic shortage of work visas signifies another year of the U.S. economy having to forego the job-creating benefits of having foreign-born talent put their skills to use here. Continued inaction risks the U.S. falling further and further behind in the global competition for talent.

Of course, legislative action would be the preferred avenue for reform, being more permanent and less controversial. However, in the face of a crisis, it is logical to explore other avenues as well. While executive action may end up being a temporary patch, even a temporary tourniquet could be effective if it stanches the loss of foreign-born talent. Any action must be legally defensible and within the executive framework (perhaps following on the example of the H-1B spouse rule proposed by DHS in May), but we trust that the administration will thoroughly consider these conditions, and hope that meaningful short-term relief on the skilled immigration crisis can be attained.


Related Articles

White House Reviewing Plan To End Visas For Spouses Of Highly Skilled Workers; CCIA Supports House Bill To Instead Protect Workers, Families

Washington – The Department of Homeland Security could publish its plan to ban on H-4 visas used by spouses of highly skilled workers as early as today. The White House’s Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs is currently reviewing the rule, and has until June 20 to do so. DHS announced last week it expected…

CCIA Responds To Threat Of Mexico Tariffs

Washington — The Trump administration has announced plans to levy tariffs on Mexican imports. The Computer & Communications Industry Association, which recently called on Congress to approve the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement, has advocated for open markets for 45 years. The following can be attributed to CCIA President & CEO Ed Black: “The Administration’s plan to…

CCIA Welcomes StartUp Act

Washington — The Computer & Communications Industry Association applauds the introduction of the Startup Act by Senators Jerry Moran, R-Kan., and Mark Warner, D-Va., along with Senators Roy Blunt, R-Mo., and Amy Klobuchar, D-Minn. The bill takes important steps toward promoting innovation and a high tech workforce. The StartUp Act would create incentives for startup…