Congress Introduces Fast-Track Trade Promotion Authority Legislation

BY Heather Greenfield
April 16, 2015

Washington — The House and Senate have introduced bipartisan legislation to give the President “fast-track” trade promotion authority (TPA). The Bipartisan Congressional Trade Priorities and Accountability Act of 2015 purports to emphasize the importance of the growing digital economy and does include better protection for the flow of data across borders, but it lacks balanced intellectual property provisions and protections for online intermediaries.

The Computer & Communication Industry Association has long supported the idea of “fast-track” trade promotion authority. However, given the stunning growth in digital trade, CCIA is disappointed to observe the lack of strong protections for that segment of the economy.

The following statement may be attributed to CCIA President & CEO, Ed Black:

“We are encouraged that the TPA legislation seeks to promote digital trade in goods and services, and to enable cross-border data flows.  Internet service exports help drive the U.S. economy, facilitating commerce across new and traditional industries.

“But 21st-century trade agreements need to address 21st-century issues, and the bills’ intellectual property language does not reflect the needs of the modern global Internet related economy.  The Internet sector increasingly relies upon, and needs in our trade agreements, the type of balancing provisions that exist in U.S. copyright law (such as fair use and online safe harbors), and protections for Internet intermediaries, which are entirely absent.

“These are crucial omissions.  We see foreign states hastily conjuring up new IP rights and regulations, which can stifle innovation — such as property rights for news headlines. These can be used to penalize U.S. Internet services entering foreign markets; thus balanced IP provisions and intermediary protections are necessary to maintain the United States’ capability to succeed in exporting Internet services.  We achieve nothing by nominally requiring trading partners to open their markets to digital commerce if they can effectively close them off again with new liability rules or IP regulations.”

Related Articles

CCIA Welcomes Review of EU Product Safety Rules

Jun 30, 2021

Brussels, BELGIUM — The European Commission today published its General Product Safety Regulation proposal. This long-awaited initiative will update the existing Directive to respond to new challenges related to digital technologies and online sales, while ensuring coherence with other Commission initiatives, in particular with the proposal for a Digital Services Act and the newly proposed…

Tech Association Response To House Bills Aimed At Handful of Tech Companies

Jun 11, 2021

Washington —  Democratic House Representatives on the House Judiciary Committee have introduced a series of interventionist bills with the aim of regulating a selected group of American digital service providers. These proposed regulations represent a shift from the market-oriented principles that have characterized U.S. economic policy. They would have a severe impact on U.S. economic…

CCIA Statement On the U.S. Innovation and Competition Act Passing the Senate

Jun 8, 2021

Washington – The Senate has approved a bill aimed at keeping the United States’ competitive edge as a leader in technology and innovation. The U.S. Innovation and Competition Act would strengthen U.S. leadership in critical technologies, such as artificial intelligence, high performance computing, and advanced manufacturing, and the commercialization of those technologies to businesses in…