EU Issues Antitrust Charges Against Google

BY Heather Greenfield
April 20, 2016

Brussels — The European Commission’s Commissioner of Competition, Margrethe Vestager, issued a Statement of Objections against Google outlining alleged competition problems with Google’s contracts for the distribution of Android and its mobile apps.  The complaint focuses on three specific issues.  The Commission has identified alleged problems with Google’s distribution of its mobile apps on Android, agreements with smartphone manufacturers to ensure that Android’s open source operating system does not fragment, and contractual agreements that establish Google search as a default search engine on some phones.

The European Commission’s announcement comes one day after the Canadian Competition Bureau’s decision to clear Google of antitrust charges, including some of the same agreements that the European Commission has outlined in its statement of objections.

The Computer & Communications Industry Association has advocated on competition issues for more than 40 years in both Washington and Brussels. The following can be attributed to CCIA Vice President James Waterworth:

“While we can appreciate the European Commission’s desire to be vigilant about investigating competition issues, the market for apps and services is extremely competitive.  At first blush, it is difficult to see the contracts identified by the Commission as being competition problems. In fact, they have clear procompetitive motivations.  The agreements identified by the Commission do not prevent hardware manufacturers and mobile operators from preinstalling whatever non-Google apps they so choose.  As a result, consumers have more choice, not less.  Furthermore, the charges are curious given the ease at which consumers can easily download competing apps and customize their phones.  In fact, nearly 80% of consumers do customize their smartphone’s home screen, and the average Android user downloads nearly 100 apps.”

“With 1.6 million Europeans working in the app economy and 100 billion app downloads in 2015 it is clear that this is a very vibrant space.”

“The contracts that the European Commission points to also make sense if one understands how open source software works and problems that frequently arise in the distribution of open source operating systems.  For example, the anti-fragmentation agreements identified in the Commission’s complaint are designed to keep a consistency across different Android implementations so users have a similar experience across devices and app developers more easily create compatible apps.  Fragmentation has hurt the competitive viability of prior distributed software projects, such as Symbian and Unix.  As such, antifragmentation agreements actually facilitate competition by allowing consumers to switch between Android phones made by different manufacturers.

“The app distribution agreements identified by the Commission are designed to give consumers a baseline user experience across all Android phones.  This is necessary to compete with proprietary operating systems, such as Apple’s iOS.  Furthermore, the agreements do not prevent the installation of other competing apps and mobile phone operators usually pre-install apps of their choosing as well.  As a result, these agreements provide users more pre-installed choices, not less.

“It’s also important to consider Android’s history. Android injected competition into the mobile marketplace, and provided consumers choice in a marketplace dominated by proprietary software.  It has also helped drastically lower the price of smartphones for consumers. Android has also allowed many different mobile phone manufacturers to enter the market more easily without the need to also develop their own operating systems and app development communities.

“The Commission needs to be careful as challenging the contractual provisions that allow open source operating systems to compete against proprietary software can backfire.  If not careful, the Commission could harm competition, not foster it.”

Related Articles

CCIA Offers Comments To Japanese Regulators On Competition In The Mobile Ecosystem

Jun 16, 2022

Washington – The Computer & Communications Industry Association (CCIA)  submitted comments on the Japan Digital Market Competition Headquarters’ (DMCH) Interim Reports on Evaluation of Competition in the Mobile Ecosystem and New Customer Contacts (Voice Assistants and Wearables). In its submission, CCIA offered Japanese antitrust regulators its view on the need for a comprehensive understanding of…

Product Safety: CCIA Europe Welcomes European Parliament Vote on New EU Rules

Jun 16, 2022

Brussels, BELGIUM — Today, the European Parliament’s Internal Market Committee (IMCO) adopted its position on the proposed General Product Safety Regulation (GPSR). The aim of these new rules is to update the European framework that ensures the safety of products sold offline and online in the EU. The Computer & Communications Industry Association (CCIA Europe)…

Fireside Chat With Hal Varian: Antitrust Bills Would Harm Tech Market, Consumers

May 24, 2022

Washington – A recent fireside chat with Google’s Chief Economist Hal Varian featured discussion on the flawed reasoning behind proposed tech regulations in antitrust bills like S. 2992, H.R. 3825, and H.R. 3826. Together with the Computer & Communications Industry Association’s Director of Research and Economics Trevor Wagener, Hal Varian countered arguments supporting the proposed…