CCIA Concerned About Government’s Attempt to Expand Hacking Powers

BY Heather Greenfield
May 2, 2016

Washington — Congress finally has an opportunity, though narrow, to block or limit a proposal to expand government and law enforcement’s power to search and manipulate computers. Last week the Supreme Court approved and forwarded to Congress the Department of Justice’s proposed changes to Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, which governs the circumstances for obtaining a warrant.

Currently, magistrate judges can only approve warrant requests in their own district. The government is asking that the scope of the rule be expanded so that any one judge could issue a warrant allowing “remote searches” covering multiple computers across multiple jurisdictions, in potentially unknown locations. These remote searches may require the deployment of “network investigative techniques,” which are effectively government hacking tools. The DOJ contends that these changes are merely procedural updates.

However, the Computer & Communications Industry Association is concerned there has been minimal public input and little understanding of the far-reaching consequences of such changes. When the government acts to expand its powers in ways that may infringe on fundamental constitutional rights such proposals must be closely scrutinized. The significance and risks of providing the government with greatly expanded hacking authority is not widely understood and needs the full attention of the Congress and the public. If Congress does nothing by December 1st, the rule change will take effect.

CCIA has fought the unreasonable expansion of government surveillance for more than a decade. The following can be attributed to CCIA President & CEO Ed Black:

“This so-called procedural update raises complex technical, Constitutional, and geopolitical concerns. A substantive expansion of government hacking powers should not be done as a behind-the-scenes rule change—its merits and drawbacks should be openly debated.

“The adoption of the remote search provisions would grant legitimacy to practices that have yet to be found constitutional under the requirements of the Fourth Amendment. A key requirement of a constitutional search is that it is focused on a known location with particularity. One problem is that a remote search inherently lacks those elements.

“We are further concerned that by using hacking tools and remotely searching computers in unknown locations, it would be all too easy to search, intrude upon and even damage the security of foreign computers, which could violate international sovereignty and is currently the subject of robust Congressional debate.”

Related Articles

Senate Commerce Hearing On Privacy; CCIA Welcomes Push To Fund FTC, Pass Privacy Legislation

Sep 29, 2021

Washington — The Senate Commerce Committee held a hearing today on consumer privacy with Chairwoman Maria Cantwell focusing on the need to pass baseline federal privacy and to ensure the FTC has adequate resources to address privacy. Ahead of the hearing, the Computer & Communications Industry Association sent a letter to committee leaders expressing appreciation…

Industry Groups Urge Protection of Fundamental Principles and Rights in the Digital Services Act

Jul 9, 2021

Brussels, BELGIUM — The Computer & Communications Industry Association (CCIA) today joined other industry organizations in a joint statement asking EU Member States to respect the fundamental principles of the e-Commerce Directive during the negotiations of the Digital Services Act (DSA)  The signatories support an ambitious DSA and its objectives to protect consumers and their…

CCIA Statement on the Enactment of the Colorado Privacy Act

Jul 8, 2021

Washington – Governor Jared Polis has signed the Colorado Privacy Act into law, making Colorado the third U.S. state to enact comprehensive consumer privacy legislation. New rules are set to take effect July 1, 2023. The Computer & Communications Industry Association welcomes Colorado lawmakers’ successful efforts to enact new rights and protections for consumer privacy.…