Coalition Sends Senators Letter Opposing Expanded Government Access To Online Activity Without Judicial Oversight

BY Heather Greenfield
June 7, 2016

Washington — A coalition of public interest groups, companies, and associations sent a letter  to senators opposing a move that would give government agents greater access to electronic communications data and records of online activity without judicial oversight. In two different Committees, the Senate is considering modifying the law authorizing National Security Letters to expand the scope of customers’ information the FBI can directly request from Internet companies without first getting a court order.

In the letter, groups including the ACLU and Computer & Communications Industry Association express concern with this expanded surveillance authority, particularly after the FBI’s history of abusing this method of gathering information in the past. The requested expansion would mean the FBI could obtain a person’s email metadata, location or browsing history by issuing a letter to companies rather than obtaining a court order first. Currently, the FBI must seek a court order to obtain much of this information in criminal and national security investigations. The legal change could get added to either a fiscal reauthorization or as an amendment to a major email privacy reform bill.

CCIA has long advocated for modernizing electronic privacy laws to better reflect the protections in the Fourth Amendment. The following can be attributed to CCIA President & CEO Ed Black:

“While we can understand law enforcement’s desire to hasten access to information, our country has always respected the need to balance this with protections for citizens, foremost of which is judicial oversight of these information requests. Removing that oversight is not a small correction of the law as it is being portrayed—it’s a significant shift in the balance the founders and Congress intended to protect private information and the exercise of rights.

“If Congress approves this change, there can be little public scrutiny going forward because of the secrecy requirements that accompany these demands. Since companies have limited ability to be transparent about requests, the public will have little knowledge of the scope or frequency of the government’s use of the expanded authority.

“Given what we now know about the government’s past abuse of surveillance laws, particularly with National Security Letters, removing judicial oversight for more types of information is a mistake and one Congress should not even be considering seriously.”

Related Articles

House Reauthorizes FISA Electronic Surveillance Without New Limitations

Jan 11, 2018

Washington — The House has voted against amendments that would have limited in how the government can use information gathered on Americans during foreign surveillance. House members rejected language that would have closed the “backdoor search loophole” by requiring a warrant for government agencies to access Americans’ communications. The House instead renewed Section 702 of…

CCIA Opposes FISA Reauthorization Amendments Act

Dec 1, 2017

Washington — Today, the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence marked up and favorably reported out the FISA Reauthorization Amendments Act, H.R. 4478, which is meant to reauthorize Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act. The Computer & Communications Industry Association opposes the legislation as reported out by the committee. The FISA Reauthorization Amendments…

CCIA Opposes Overly Broad DOJ Request For Data from Protest Website

Aug 15, 2017

Washington — A web hosting provider is facing an overly broad Department of Justice search warrant, demanding that it turn over information on more than a million visitors to an anti-Trump protest website. In a blog post Monday, Dreamhost explained why it has sought to narrow DOJ’s demand for access to 1.3 million IP addresses…