Small European businesses vs. new EU VAT bureaucracy

BY Heather Greenfield
September 5, 2017

An often overlooked European success story is how hundred of thousands of European small companies have thrived thanks to the Internet.  With a few clicks on the keyboard, the smallest European firm can now export to consumers across the EU, and the rest of the world.

Unfortunately, this success is now under threat.  European governments are revising the EU Value Added Tax (VAT) framework, originally intended to “support e-commerce and online businesses,” in a way that will hurt small European online businesses big time.

Rather than reflecting the new e-commerce promise, European governments risk imposing old, outdated rules on our new online market reality.  The European Commission’s original VAT proposal, tabled in December 2016, did include many improvements, including a much needed EU wide portal for online VAT payments.  However, the current text imposes new taxes and administrative burdens on tens of thousands of exporting European micro-businesses.

The proposal sets a pan-European, low 10,000 Euro threshold for applying VAT on cross-border sales.  Once a seller has sold 10,001 Euros worth of goods to another EU country, he or she is faced with a Kafkaesque bureaucracy of complying with 28 different national VAT rates for all subsequent sales in the EU.

Some 150 different VAT rates apply to products across the EU Member States.  The same product may be covered by a standard VAT rate in one country, by a reduced rate in another, and may be exempt in a third.  Whew – what a mess!  Making sure a seller charges the right VAT rate and complies with the invoicing and other rules of the country of the customer requires tailored local legal advice.  Such advice is costly – and we fear that small European sellers will stop selling to other EU Member States to limit their liability.  

The European Commission has long complained that “only 7% of SMEs online sell cross-border” and promised to “help cross-border e-commerce to flourish”.  Yet its proposed ultra low ceiling will increase the VAT bureaucracy for European small sellers and limit choice for European consumers.  This goes against the objectives for a thriving EU Digital Single Market.

An alternative, equally ill-designed approach, is to make online marketplaces liable for collecting and remitting VAT on behalf of their business users.  But marketplaces often do not have structured product data and don’t know all possible VAT rates.  Product descriptions, in the vast majority of instances, fail to attribute the right VAT rate.  Most marketplaces never have physical possession of the products nor are they party to the contract between the seller and buyer.  In most cases, they do not handle payments, delivery, etc.  

Forcing marketplaces into strict control over the trade third parties conduct on their sites would effectively mean an end to the open marketplace model that proved so successful in enabling small businesses to trade online.  The alternative is a closed marketplace model, where small business users become mere suppliers of the platform, without the liberties attached to independently running their businesses.

The EU VAT negotiations look set to conclude in coming months.  Currently small European businesses will be sacrificed by a Kafkaesque EU VAT bureaucracy.  Hopefully, the EU will update its VAT framework to reflect the new e-commerce reality.  This would be in line with the objectives for a thriving European Digital Single Market and benefit small EU businesses and European consumers.

 

Related Articles

German Legislature Preempts EU Reforms with National Competition Law Amendments Targeting the Digital Economy

Jan 14, 2021

Berlin, GERMANY — Members of the German parliament voted to approve far-reaching regulations for large digital platforms today. Once signed into law, the proposal would make Germany the first jurisdiction in the EU specifically regulating market power in the digital economy. The reform introduces article 19a in the German “Act against Restraints of Competition,” setting…

New EU Cybersecurity Rules Should Promote Security Mitigation, Avoid Compliance Red Tape

Dec 16, 2020

Brussels, BELGIUM — The European Commission published today a legislative proposal to update the 2016 Network and Information Security Directive.  The proposal aims to reduce regulatory inconsistencies across the EU’s internal market and it encourages security information sharing to help companies effectively address future cybersecurity risks. But the proposal also suggests that cloud computing providers,…

CCIA Responses To EU Digital Markets Act and Digital Services Act Proposals

Dec 15, 2020

Brussels, BELGIUM — The European Commission presented its Digital Markets Act (DMA) and its Digital Services Act (DSA) proposals earlier today. The Digital Markets Act seeks to target the core services of so-called digital “gatekeepers” by restructuring their relationships with business users and imposing new terms and obligations. These obligations can be updated, new services…