Pai Says the Biggest ISPs that Control Users’ Access to Internet Services Can Be Trusted; Instead Deflects Blame, Scrutiny on Internet Services

BY Rachael Stelly
December 4, 2017

Washington — Since FCC Chairman Ajit Pai’s plan to repeal net neutrality rules was released, there has been widespread concern expressed from the public, startups, and Internet companies, launching a heated debate. Last week, a speech by Pai muddied the waters surrounding the plan to dismantle net neutrality.

The speech tried to deflect attention from Internet Service Providers (ISPs) to edge providers, claiming that web-based services are the real worry when it comes to limiting consumer choice of content. Pai stated: “[D]espite all the talk about the fear that broadband providers could decide what Internet content consumers can see, recent experience shows that so-called edge providers are in fact deciding what content they see. These providers routinely block or discriminate against content they don’t like.”  

It’s easy to confuse the terms block and throttle, but in the context of the net neutrality debate, they refer to an ISP’s ability to block or throttle any and all traffic requested by the user while it’s going through their part of the network. Chairman Pai’s use of these terms in a separate context is an attempt to confuse and distract. It also fails to offer a compelling justification for repealing the 2015 Open Internet rules that were approved by a Federal Appeals Court just last year.

At its core, the principle of net neutrality is that all data and all legal Internet traffic should be treated in a non-discriminatory manner. The 2015 rules upheld this principle by banning anti-competitive practices such as blocking, throttling, and discrimination. The FCC applied these rules to the only actors who have the incentive and ability to undermine net neutrality by engaging in these practices — the biggest ISPs. As CCIA argued in an amicus brief at the D.C. Circuit, ISPs have enormous control over the delivery of the Internet to consumers. ISPs have a unique power over web traffic including the exclusive ability to control traffic at interconnection points, which are necessary for edge providers even to reach their customers. Absent clear net neutrality rules, ISPs are free to extract tolls at these points or degrade delivery of web traffic to their subscribers.

Pai’s ‘whataboutism’ thus fails on two counts. First, it in no way addresses broadband providers’ incentive and ability to engage in discriminatory practices — AT&T and Comcast have done so in the past, and without these rules, they’ll be unleashed to do so in the future. Second, it ignores that edge providers are subject to significant competitive pressures that ISPs are not. Lost in the Chairman’s speech was the fact that edge providers just don’t have the same massive control over internet users as broadband internet access providers — and the law reflects that.

This false equivalence does not inform the debate. The debate should return to the heart of net neutrality – ensuring an open Internet free of ISP interference by blocking, throttling, or discrimination schemes.

 

Related Articles

Public Interest Groups, CCIA Ask For Rehearing On Net Neutrality Case

Dec 13, 2019

Washington — The Computer & Communication Industry Association joined public interest groups in a petition for the court to re-hear the most recent national net neutrality case. In October, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit found the FCC can choose to give up its role protecting nondiscriminatory internet access. Public Knowledge, Free…

U.S. Appeals Court Gives Mixed Ruling On FCC Order To Abdicate Net Neutrality Enforcement

Oct 1, 2019

Washington —  A federal court has found the FCC can choose to give up its role protecting nondiscriminatory internet access, but the ruling appears to leave the door open for states to enforce net neutrality.  The U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit issued its lengthy ruling in Mozilla v. the FCC today.   Mozilla…

CCIA Welcomes FCC Commissioner Confirmations

Jan 3, 2019

Washington — The Computer & Communications Industry Association welcomes the Senate reconfirmation of Brendan Carr, as well as the unanimous confirmation of Geoffrey Starks, as commissioners of the Federal Communications Commission. These confirmations fill the five-seat panel, which had been operating at a deficit since Mignon Clyburn stepped down in mid-2018. The following can be…