CCIA Submits Comments To OSTP Supporting Privacy Enhancing Technologies

July 8, 2022

Washington – The Computer & Communications Industry Association filed comments in response to an Office of Science and Technology Policy request for information on Privacy Enhancing Technologies (PETs), which are automated processes for minimizing data usage and disclosure. PETs have the ability to “recode privacy law” in a manner that minimizes risk of unwanted disclosure while making user data more useful than ever.

CCIA told OSTP that the federal government could create incentives to encourage PET adoption both within existing regulations, such as rules governing procurement and health care information, and as part of any forthcoming federal privacy legislation in the form of safe harbors and exemptions centered on adoption of reliable PETs.

Related Articles

CCIA Files Comments On FTC Proposal To Expand Jurisdiction On Privacy Rules

Washington –  The Computer & Communications Industry Association submitted comments to the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) Monday in response to the agency’s Advanced Notice of Proposed Rulemaking on whether it should consider new trade rules on the collection, use and transfer of consumer data. CCIA noted that the FTC’s rulemaking and enforcement authority is limited…

CCIA Offers Comments On Implementing California Privacy Protections

Washington – As the California Privacy Protection Agency closed its 15-day public comment period regarding suggested modifications to privacy regulations under the California Privacy Rights Act on November 7,  the Computer & Communications Industry Association offered suggestions today on how to implement the rules in ways that protect consumers, improve clarity and protect innovation.  CCIA…

CCIA Files Comments On Colorado Privacy Act

Washington – The Computer & Communications Industry Association has filed comments in response to the Colorado Department of Law request for input on implementing the Colorado Privacy Act.  CCIA noted several instances where definitions were vague and asked for more legal clarity on that as well as universal opt out mechanisms. The filing also noted…